In the history of attempts to invent an "eternal" magnet motor has played a significant role.
Losers inventors in various ways tried to use a magnet to arrange a mechanism that would ever move itself. Here is a project of such a "mechanism"
(described in the XVII century Englishman John Vilkensom, Bishop of Chester)
A strong magnet is placed on the column. To her leaning against two inclined chutes M and N, one above the other, with the upper M has a small hole at the top of C, N and the lower curved. If, - says the inventor, - the upper trough to put a small iron ball B, the attraction due to the magnet and the ball rolled up, but when he reached the hole he will fall into the lower groove N, roll it on down, runs up on the curvature of the gutter and D of this reaches the upper trough M, hence, attracted by a magnet, it will roll back up again to fail through the hole, roll down again and again find himself on the top groove to start moving again. Thus, the ball will be non-stop run to and fro, carrying out "perpetual motion".
What is the absurdity of this invention? Specify it's not hard.
Why inventor thought that ball, rolled down the chute N to its lower end,
will still have sufficient speed to lift it up curvature of the D? So it would be if the ball rolled under the influence of gravity alone: if he'd rolled down rapidly. But our ball is under the influence of two forces: gravity and magnetic attraction. Last, by assumption, so much that can make the ball go up in the position to C. Therefore, the chute ball will roll N is not accelerating and decelerating, and even if you reach the bottom end, then at least do not accumulate the speed required for lifting of curvature of the D.
The described project is many times re-surfaced in various later modifications.
One of these projects was even, oddly enough, is patented in Germany in 1878, ie, thirty years after the proclamation of the law of conservation of energy!
The inventor of the so ridiculous masked the basic idea of "perpetual magnetic motor" that misled the technical commission, issued patents. And although, according to the statute, patents for inventions, the idea that contradicts the laws of nature, shall not be granted, the invention at this time it was formally patented. Perhaps the lucky owner of a unique patent soon became disillusioned with their offspring,
because after two years longer to make the fee and curious patent unenforceable, the "invention" was in the public domain.3 However, it is no use to anyone.
Losers inventors in various ways tried to use a magnet to arrange a mechanism that would ever move itself. Here is a project of such a "mechanism"
(described in the XVII century Englishman John Vilkensom, Bishop of Chester)
A strong magnet is placed on the column. To her leaning against two inclined chutes M and N, one above the other, with the upper M has a small hole at the top of C, N and the lower curved. If, - says the inventor, - the upper trough to put a small iron ball B, the attraction due to the magnet and the ball rolled up, but when he reached the hole he will fall into the lower groove N, roll it on down, runs up on the curvature of the gutter and D of this reaches the upper trough M, hence, attracted by a magnet, it will roll back up again to fail through the hole, roll down again and again find himself on the top groove to start moving again. Thus, the ball will be non-stop run to and fro, carrying out "perpetual motion".
What is the absurdity of this invention? Specify it's not hard.
Why inventor thought that ball, rolled down the chute N to its lower end,
will still have sufficient speed to lift it up curvature of the D? So it would be if the ball rolled under the influence of gravity alone: if he'd rolled down rapidly. But our ball is under the influence of two forces: gravity and magnetic attraction. Last, by assumption, so much that can make the ball go up in the position to C. Therefore, the chute ball will roll N is not accelerating and decelerating, and even if you reach the bottom end, then at least do not accumulate the speed required for lifting of curvature of the D.
The described project is many times re-surfaced in various later modifications.
One of these projects was even, oddly enough, is patented in Germany in 1878, ie, thirty years after the proclamation of the law of conservation of energy!
The inventor of the so ridiculous masked the basic idea of "perpetual magnetic motor" that misled the technical commission, issued patents. And although, according to the statute, patents for inventions, the idea that contradicts the laws of nature, shall not be granted, the invention at this time it was formally patented. Perhaps the lucky owner of a unique patent soon became disillusioned with their offspring,
because after two years longer to make the fee and curious patent unenforceable, the "invention" was in the public domain.3 However, it is no use to anyone.
667789
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete